Issues we have tried to address from the critique of the first prototype:
- Issues were raised concerning the structural integrity of the side table, particularly when it was swiveled out and extended. Specifically, it was thought that there would be a possibility that the unit would tip over if too much off-center weight was added to the extended table top. We considered integrating a counterweight to the base to prevent this from happening but decided against this out of fear that this would make the unit too heavy and cumbersome. Ultimately, we ran tests with the actual materials we intended to use and determined that this was not a factor given the dimensions of our unit.
- Someone pointed out that we might have trouble keeping the cantilevered table top straight once weight was placed on it. After trying several different methods of attaching the table top to the central pole, we settled upon using the bottom piece of a pipe clamp. The clamp offered the tightest fit we were able to find, which was important since any loose space between the central pole the table top would prevent the table top from holding firm. A metal plate was welded to the pipe clamp to brace the table top from the bottom and keep it as straight as possible.
- Questions were also raised regarding the child-friendliness and safeness of the unit, particularly given the fact that Lisa lives with a small child. We felt that the aspect that might potentially pose the most danger was the table top sliding along the pole, and the possibility that it might come down suddenly. We felt that we found an adequate solution in the mechanism that was chosen to lock the table top to the pole, in that the pipe clamp is not something that can be manipulated with an incidental amount of force. It requires direct pressure on the clamp button to release its hold on the pole.
- A member of the class mentioned that there might not be enough usable work space on the table top if it was used from a sofa or a chair with an arm rest. Taking this into account, we tried to lengthen the table top to increase this amount of space, while conscious of the amount of leverage we would be exerting on the base of the unit. Ultimately, the length of the table top was a compromise between the amount of work space and the structural integrity of the unit.




























![P28-10-09_11.21[1] P28-10-09_11.21[1]](http://valngo.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/p28-10-09_11-211.jpg?w=150&h=112)

![P28-10-09_11.46[1] P28-10-09_11.46[1]](http://valngo.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/p28-10-09_11-461.jpg?w=150&h=112)

![P26-10-09_15.37[1] P26-10-09_15.37[1]](http://valngo.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/p26-10-09_15-3711.jpg?w=150&h=112)

![P27-10-09_14.09[1] P27-10-09_14.09[1]](http://valngo.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/p27-10-09_14-091.jpg?w=150&h=112)
![P27-10-09_14.09[2] P27-10-09_14.09[2]](http://valngo.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/p27-10-09_14-092.jpg?w=150&h=112)





